Practice Environment Scale-Nursing Work Index for use in primary health care: a qualitative content validity study
PDF

Palabras clave

Entrevistas como Tema
Enfermería
Atención Primaria de Salud
Psicometría
Validez y fiabilidad
Condiciones de Trabajo

Cómo citar

Zabaleta del Olmo, E., Reñé-Reñé, A., Sauch-Valmaña, G., Ríos-Jiménez, A., Marchal-Torralbo, A., Rey-Reñones, C., Brunet-Reverté, N., Barnés-Vallés, I., Zamora-Sánchez, J.-J., Artigas-Lage, M., Urpí-Fernández, A.-M., Planas-Campmany, C., Díaz-Herrera, M.- Ángel, Calvet-Tort, G., & Gimeno-Pi, I. (2025). Practice Environment Scale-Nursing Work Index for use in primary health care: a qualitative content validity study. RqR Quantitative and Qualitative Community Nursing Research, 13(3). Recuperado a partir de https://rqr.seapaonline.org/index.php/rqr/article/view/103

Resumen

Objetivo

Evaluar la validez de contenido de una versión adaptada de la Practice Environment Scale–Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) para su uso en Atención Primaria (AP).

Métodos

Se realizó un estudio cualitativo mediante entrevistas cognitivas. Ocho enfermeras de AP con perfiles diversos completaron la versión adaptada de la PES-NWI y participaron en entrevistas para explorar cómo interpretaron los ítems. El analisis se realizó utilizando el Question Appraisal System 99 (QAS-99), apoyado con notas de campo y verificación de transcripciones. Los problemas detectados se categorizaron según  claridad, conocimientos requeridos, suposiciones y formato de respuesta, y sirvieron para guiar la adaptación del cuestionario.

Resultados

Veintiséis de los 34 ítems (76,5 %) fueron identificados como problemáticos por al menos una participante, con un total de 56 problemas codificados. La mayoría (87,5 %) se relacionaban con problemas de claridad, especialmente por formulaciones ambiguas o imprecisas. Todas las participantes consideraron los ítems relevantes y no identificaron ausencia de contenidos. Se realizaron modificaciones para mejorar la claridad y la adecuación contextual. La versión final fue aprobada por las participantes, el equipo investigador y la autora de la escala original.

Conclusión

La elevada proporción de ítems con problemas de claridad destaca el valor de las entrevistas cognitivas para identificar dificultades interpretativas y mejorar su redacción. Las participantes consideraron la escala adaptada relevante y exhaustiva, lo que respalda su validez de contenido y adecuación al contexto de la AP. Este estudio ofrece una metodología replicable para examiner la validez de contenido desde la perspectiva de la población destinataria.

PDF

Citas

Lake ET. Development of the practice environment scale of the nursing work index. Res Nurs Health. 2002 Jun;25(3):176–88.

Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Lake ET, Cheney T. Effects of Hospital Care Environment on Patient Mortality and Nurse Outcomes. JONA J Nurs Adm. 2009 Jul;39(7/8):S45–51.

Copanitsanou P, Fotos N, Brokalaki H. Effects of work environment on patient and nurse outcomes. Br J Nurs. 2017;26(3):172–6.

Bahlman‐van Ooijen W, Malfait S, Huisman‐de Waal G, Hafsteinsdóttir TB. Nurses’ motivations to leave the nursing profession: A qualitative meta‐aggregation. J Adv Nurs. 2023 Dec;79(12):4455–71.

Paguio JT, Yu DSF, Su JJ. Systematic review of interventions to improve nurses’ work environments. J Adv Nurs. 2020 Oct;76(10):2471–93.

World Health Organization. State of the world’s nursing 2020: investing in education, jobs and leadership [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020 [cited 2025 Jun 10]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/331677

Swiger PA, Patrician PA, Miltner RS (Susie), Raju D, Breckenridge-Sproat S, Loan LA. The Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index: An updated review and recommendations for use. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Sep;74:76–84.

Chang Y, Chang H, Feng J. Appraisal and evaluation of the instruments measuring the nursing work environment: A systematic review. J Nurs Manag. 2022 Apr;30(3):670–83.

Maassen SM, Weggelaar Jansen AMJW, Brekelmans G, Vermeulen H, Van Oostveen CJ. Psychometric evaluation of instruments measuring the work environment of healthcare professionals in hospitals: a systematic literature review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Nov 9;32(8):545–57.

Terwee CB, Prinsen CAC, Chiarotto A, Westerman MJ, Patrick DL, Alonso J, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159–70.

Mokkink L, Prinsen C, Patrick D, Alonso J, Bouter L, de Vet H, et al. COSMIN Study Design checklist for Patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. [Internet]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Medical Centers; 2019 [cited 2025 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf

Alzate LCC, Bayer GLA, Squires A. Validation of a Spanish Version of the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index in the Colombian Context. Hisp Health Care Int. 2014 Mar 1;12(1):34–42.

Ambani Z, Al-Hamdan Z, Al-Touby S, Ghanim A, Al Jarameez F, Squires A. Content Validation of the Arabic Translation of the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index-Revised. J Nurs Meas. 2019 Aug 1;27(2):234–46.

Fuentelsaz-Gallego C, Moreno-Casbas MT, González-María E. Validation of the Spanish version of the questionnaire Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Feb;50(2):274–80.

Orts-Cortés MI, Moreno-Casbas T, Squires A, Fuentelsaz-Gallego C, Maciá-Soler L, González-María E. Content validity of the Spanish version of the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index. Appl Nurs Res. 2013 Nov;26(4):e5–9.

Drennan J. Cognitive interviewing: verbal data in the design and pretesting of questionnaires: Cognitive interviewing. J Adv Nurs. 2003;42(1):57–63.

Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 2005. 335 p.

Wright J, Moghaddam N, Dawson DL. Cognitive interviewing in patient-reported outcome measures: A systematic review of methodological processes. Qual Psychol. 2021 Feb;8(1):2–29.

Hirschey R, Nance J, Wangen M, Bryant AL, Wheeler SB, Herrera J, et al. Using Cognitive Interviewing to Design Interventions for Implementation in Oncology Settings. Nurs Res. 2021 May;70(3):206–14.

Rajan D, Rouleau K, Winkelmann M, Kringos D, Khalid F. Implementing the Primary Health Care Approach: a Primer [Internet]. Geneve: World Health Organization; 2024 [cited 2025 Jul 11]. (Global Report on Primary Health Care). Report No.: Volume 1. Available from: https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/publications/i/implementing-the-primary-health-care-approach-a-primer

Saint-Pierre C, Herskovic V, Sepúlveda M. Multidisciplinary collaboration in primary care: a systematic review. Fam Pract. 2018 Mar 27;35(2):132–41.

de Pedro Gómez J, Morales-Asencio J, Sesé Abad A, Bennasar-Veny M, Artigues Vives G, Pericàs Beltran J. Validación y adaptación al español de la escala del entorno de práctica enfermera del Nursing Work Index. Metas Enferm. 2009;12(7):65–75.

de Pedro-Gómez J, Morales-Asencio JM, Sesé-Abad A, Bennasar-Veny M, Pericas-Beltran J, Miguélez-Chamorro A. Psychometric testing of the Spanish version of the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index in a primary healthcare context: PES-NWI in Spanish primary healthcare nurses. J Adv Nurs. 2012 Jan;68(1):212–21.

Gea-Caballero V, Juárez-Vela R, Díaz-Herrera MÁ, Mármol-López MI, Alfaro Blazquez R, Martínez-Riera JR. Development of a short questionnaire based on the Practice Environment Scale-Nursing Work Index in primary health care. PeerJ. 2019 Jul 24;7:e7369.

Lucas P, Jesus E, Almeida S, Araújo B. Validation of the Psychometric Properties of the Practice Environment Scale of Nursing Work Index in Primary Health Care in Portugal. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 14;18(12):6422.

Boeije H, Willis G. The Cognitive Interviewing Reporting Framework (CIRF): Towards the Harmonization of Cognitive Testing Reports. Methodology. 2013 Aug 1;9(3):87–95.

Zabaleta‐Del‐Olmo E, Rey‐Reñones C, Marchal‐Torralbo A, Sauch‐Valmaña G, Calvet‐Tort G, Planas‐Campmany C, et al. Structural Validity and Reliability of an Adapted Practice Environment Scale‐Nursing Work Index for Primary Health Care Nurses. Res Nurs Health. 2025 Jun 4;nur.22474.

Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures: Spine. 2000 Dec;25(24):3186–91.

Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross‐cultural health care research: a clear and user‐friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Apr;17(2):268–74.

Willis GB, Lessler JT. Question Appraisal System QAS-99. Rockwille MD: Research Triangle Institute; 1999.

Lessler J, Forsyth B. A coding system for appraising questionnaires. In: Schwarz N, Sudman S, editors. Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons; 1996. p. 259–91.

Buers C, Triemstra M, Bloemendal E, Zwijnenberg NC, Hendriks M, Delnoij DMJ. The value of cognitive interviewing for optimizing a patient experience survey. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2014 Jul 4;17(4):325–40.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, National Academy of Medicine, Committe on the Future of Nursing 2020-2030. The Role of Nurses in Improving Health Equity. In: Wakefield M, Williams D, Le Menestrel S, Fllaubert J, editors. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press (US); 2021.

World Health Organization. Primary Health Care [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Jun 12]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/primary-health-care

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.

Derechos de autor 2025 RqR Quantitative and Qualitative Community Nursing Research